Every story is a science story

Critics sometimes say that Scientific American Deviating from the so-called “classical scientific content” and entering a topic that does not belong to us.

This claim often bubbles up when we publish related stories Social justice or in support of human rights research and health care for transgender peoplefor example, or Abortion is basic medical care. One Twitter user responded section of the proposal Against forcing trans girls to play on boys’ sports teams, she said, “You should probably shift everything to science, facts and statistics and give up your insomnia. [SIC], narrative bias, and agenda setting. It’s not good for your credibility.”

In response to a recent job listing outlining our commitment to diversity and inclusion, someone else tweeted: “Advancing DEI and Social Justice is not a priority for any truth-seeking organization or organization.”

These detractors are telling us to “stay in line,” that scientific research is pure, clean, absolutely objective activity, and that what we publish must be free from the opinions of those affected by politics and the culture of scientific research. . But the truth is that science is relevant to all elements of society, including everything policy and politics.

For a publication that aims to explain the world around us, that means yes every row is our row.

Using data-driven reasoning and analysis, science solves problems and provides answers to key social questions. For example, after sequencing the human genome In 2001, researchers who analyzed our genetic code showed that there were no significant differences between people belonging to different racial categories. This helped change the narrative around the genetic meaning of race-this it is a social constructnot biological.

A fascinating study called Turnaway from the University of California, San Francisco found this out long-term effects of abortion. Anti-abortion activists claim that those who undergo the procedure suffer emotional and physical harm afterward. The researchers found just the opposite. By following nearly 1,000 pregnant women who had or refused abortions, the researchers found that women who failed to access abortion services experienced a range of adverse outcomes. This included financial problems, lower educational attainment, and physical and mental health problems compared to women who were able to obtain an abortion. This medical procedure, politicized by those who believe women should not be in control of their bodies, is not only safe and effective stable and positive results.

Our recent featured article challenged the popular notion that Viking culture was primarily and always male. Michelle Hyer Smith, an anthropological archaeologist at Brown University, found this out Viking women controlled the production of textiles for salemaking them economic leaders in this society romanticized by white-collar workers and incels (which stands for “involuntary marriage” and is a hallmark of misogynist groups).

Science should shed light on controversial topics, and that is part of our mission share your evidence relevant to important social issues.

Editors in 2020 Scientific American Endorsed Joe Biden in the presidential election. One Twitter user said: “Being political means being biased and a journal called Scientific should not be biased.” To be honest, we have a history of weighing in on political partisanship and controversial issues. In April 1950, the magazine planned to publish an article written by physicist Hans Bethe (who had worked on the Manhattan Project) criticizing the development of the hydrogen bomb. agents when the Federal Atomic Energy Commission received the manuscript all 3,000 copies of the issue were burned containing the article. More than 30 years later, we published technical critiques of Bethe and other physicists. A space-based missile defense system known as Star Wars.

Science offers voters policy makers and political leaders essential understanding of best practices. In contrast, governance involves political decisions about science. The executive and legislative branches are established budget allocation Billions of dollars in medical research and technological innovation for the energy sector, military equipment, health and food security, national infrastructure and education. Perhaps a reflection of this close relationship, the number of STEM-educated candidates is at an all-time high running for political office this year, according to the political action committee 314 Operating Fund. They are meteorologists, doctors and many others who seek to apply their expertise in scientific thinking to policy making.

Telling us, or scientists or other science writers, to “stay on our toes” is a distraction tactic that will divide those with relevant knowledge. In some cases, the critique attempts to preserve the power of wealthy, white, male members of society. When does this criticism usually come? We report on scientific relevance for health and well-being disempowered groupsIt is not a pure denial of what is suggested is science behind social problems. Science is everywhere, and so are we Scientific American It will continue to cover social justice and science related to the most important questions facing human society.

Source link

Leave a Comment